Character Analysis Of The Movie 12 Angry Men - 764 Words

In the movie Twelve Angry Men, Henry Fonda is the eighth jury member but is also known as Mr. Davis. Henry Fonda’s role is one of the most important throughout the movie. But, throughout the movie it involves eleven other jurors that have significant contributions and differences, that discuss the murder trial for an eighteen year old boy. The audience of the movie will watch the twelve jury members discuss the murder trial of an eighteen year old boy whose been accused of killing his father. At the beginning of the movie all jurors proceed a vote saying the boy is guilty of the murder but one juror votes not guilty. In the movie 12 Angry Men cause people to question their own morals and beliefs, but the overall outcome of the movie shows†¦show more content†¦Even though these characters have valid points about the boy and stick to the hard evidence. These three jurors are blind to the outside information and have a hard time looking further into the case to find othe r logic in the situation. â€Å"It is important to realize that not all questions are geniune ones† (Roth 400). Juror number three by the end finally realizes his out of control behavior caused his life to be full of anger. His realization made him realize his morals were harshly mistaken. Even though some of these characters were out of control, they still found honesty in their beliefs and did not give up the original evidence. Later in the movie the jurors found spots in the evidence that did not match up. Many people can relate to these characters by situations of standing their ground for something and being honest with people in situations like this. There are two other characters that many can relate to. Juror nine and two are two characters that don’t get to speak much in the movie. Others tend to speak over them or get interrupted by other characters. All the other jurors don’t give these two characters their time to voice their thoughts. Juror number n ine was played by an older man that was one of the wisest characters in the movie. Juror number nines caring and compassion towards the young boy on trial makes this character easy to relate to. Juror number three was quiet and unsure of his decisions. He was very easy to be persuaded by theShow MoreRelated12 Angry Men: Communication Analysis Paper1046 Words   |  5 PagesSPCM 8:00a MWF April 17, 2006 Communication Analysis Paper 12 Angry Men For an in-depth look into the workings of small groups few movies have offered more than the beloved classic, 12 Angry Men. A small group is defined as group of approximately 5 to 12 people who share a common purpose and follow similar organizing rule. 12 Angry Men, as its title suggests, depicts a story of exactly 12 men who form such a group. The movie opens in the first state of Group Development, theRead MoreEssay 12 Angry Men Analysis931 Words   |  4 Pages12 Angry Men Analysis 12 Angry Men is a movie, directed by Sidney Lumet, about twelve jurors who are deliberating a murder trial. An 18 year old has been accused of murdering his father and the jury has retired to determine his fate. The jury performs a preliminary vote and the results came out to be eleven for guilty and one, the architect played by Henry Fonda, for not-guilty. The rest of the jury then begins to persuade the architect that the accused is actually guilty. Each member ofRead More12 Angry Men1722 Words   |  7 PagesThe 12 Angry Men Case Dennis Ojwang Organizational Management 701 February 26, 2015 When this movie was made, no one could have depicted that it would greatly speak of the ever changing dynamics of our world today. Immigration and diversity seem to have plagued the world now more than ever and it is no surprise that the business world has been changed tremendously. When this movie came out in 1957, there wasn’t much diversity as we see it today. Upon watching this movie, various topics coveredRead MoreIn the 12 angry men I recognized several different social- psychological principles. This movie is900 Words   |  4 PagesIn the 12 angry men I recognized several different social- psychological principles. This movie is filled with different concepts, views, and ways of thinking. Each principle has some way of fitting into the movie. I have watched this movie before this assignment but watching it for the assignment made me look at the different principles involved. There are numerous different concepts that could be used however, I just chose a few. I am g oing to list some that I noticed while watching the film.Read MoreMovie Analysis : 12 Angry Men1639 Words   |  7 Pageswithin a diverse group.The purpose of this paper is to analyze the importance of cooperative communities while providing different aspects of leadership. Movie Summary The movie 12 Angry Men is a depiction of a jury deliberation in the 1950’s involving the trial of a teenager that is accused of murdering his father. These twelve men were brought together by a random selection process to make a unanimous decision. In the beginning, all jurors believed the boy to be guilty without a doubtRead More12 Angry Men: an Illustration of Concepts of Organisational Behaviour2175 Words   |  9 Pages12 Angry Men: An Illustration of Concepts of Organisational Behaviour Introduction In 1957 Sidney Lumet’s 12 Angry Men was published (Lumet, 1957). Now, 55 years later, the movie’s teachings still hold most of their truths. The events shown in the movie can be scientifically explained using concepts of organisational behaviour. Although some of these concepts did not even exist by the time the movie was made, the movie still is an excellent case to study and illustrate them. The reason for thisRead MoreJustice In Reginald Roses 12 Angry Men1532 Words   |  7 Pagesrighteousness is for an individual. The perspective of justice a person has however is not the only factor that comes into play, when establishing whether the defendant is guilty or innocent. The play, ‘12 angry men’, written by Reginald Rose, is a drama involved around a jury and a homicide case. In comparison, the movie, ‘To kill a mockingbird’, directed by Robert Mulligan, follows the tale of Atticus Finch, a lawyer, who defends a black man against fabricated r ape charges, and the evils of racism and stereotypingRead MoreEssay about The Problem of Groupthink in 12 Angry Men934 Words   |  4 Pagessituational context includes the circumstances of the groups meeting, social roles and expected behavior. This notion is exemplified during the movie, 12 Angry Men. The purpose of this essay is to examine the movie content to display the groupthink symptoms in place. Groupthink consists of eight major factors that occur during the films scenes, as the twelve men debate a premeditated murder court case. All of the factors continue to rise as the jury discusses the young mans fate. During the film, aRead MoreGrendel Character Analysis Essay775 Words   |  4 PagesGrendel character analysis Terrorizing a town for 12 years Grendel kills countless men and woman in the epic of Beowulf. Banished to an underwater dwelling when descendants of Cain were banished and killed, many warriors faced him but few survived. Many have herd of Grendel and his tale of horror, but who is Grendel? Grendel is seen by other people in Beowulf as a monster and a fiend even before his name is mentioned the narrator refers to him as a â€Å"powerful monster, living down in the darkness†Read MoreUse of Persuasive Argument in 12 Angry Men Essay1037 Words   |  5 PagesThe movie â€Å"12 Angry Men† examines the dynamics at play in a United States jury room in the 1950’s. It revolves around the opinions and mindsets of twelve diverse characters that are tasked with pronouncing the guilt or innocence of a young man accused of patricide. The extraordinary element is that their finding will determine his life or death. This play was made into a movie in 1957, produced by Henry Fonda who played the lead role, Juror #8, and Reginald Rose who wrote the original screenplay